Legally Enforceable?
Yes, a non-compete is enforceable under the following conditions:[1]
- Signed at the time of employment. Must be an ancillary to or part of an offer for employment;
- Limitations. The non-compete is made to the extent that it contains limitations as to time, geographical area, and scope of activity to be restrained that are reasonable and do not impose a greater restraint than is necessary to protect the goodwill or other business interest; and
- Restrictions for physicians. If a physician signs a non-compete, the following rules apply:
- Cannot deny access to a list of patients the physician has treated within the past year;
- Must provide access to medical records of the physician’s patients (for a reasonable fee); and
- That any list of patients or medical records is provided in a format agreeable by both the employer and physician.
An attorney cannot participate in any type of relationship or agreement that restricts their right to practice within the State.[2]
Texas requires that for a non-compete to be valid, it “must be supported by consideration.”[3]
Texas recognizes consideration as a “present exchange bargained for in return for a promise.” Therefore, no matter the training or knowledge gained in the past, it does not constitute sufficient consideration for continued employment.[4]
If an at-will employee agrees to a non-compete, such covenant “must be supported by independent valuable consideration.”[3]
Blue Penciling
Texas statutes allow for an overbroad non-compete in relation to time, geographical area, or scope of activity to be reformed and made enforceable in accordance with State law. Such rulings will be made when a court deems the restraints to be more than necessary to protect the goodwill of the business.[7]
Sources
- Sec. 15.50
- 5.06 (Restrictions on Right to Practice)
- Alex Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. Johnson (2006)
- CRC-Evans Pipeline International, Inc. v. Myers (1996)
- Gallagher Healthcare Ins. v. Vogelsang (2010)
- Cobb v. Caye Publishing Group (2010)
- § 15.51(c)
- BDO Seidman v. Hirshberg (1999)
- Cherne Indus., Inc. v. Grounds & Associates (1979)
- Hagerty, Lockenvitz, Ginzkey & Associates v. Ginzkey (1980)